|
|
Post by Nathan on Jan 13, 2009 21:02:38 GMT -6
we need a bosarch for Lindstrom City to officiate the wedding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Jan 17, 2009 16:32:57 GMT -6
no one wants the extra title at least?
im shocked, you are all awful micronationalists.
|
|
|
|
Post by Emperor Konrad on Jan 17, 2009 19:27:33 GMT -6
I think the role conflicts with my other duties so i shall have to pass. Im sure one of the new Barons would love an extra title. Anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by William on Jan 20, 2009 18:52:52 GMT -6
Please someone? Martti? Christian?
|
|
|
|
Post by Amir Shervanis on Feb 3, 2009 17:38:08 GMT -6
Provided it's this Thursday, EST, I can do it when I get home from morning class (like around noon) on behalf of the Nondenominational Temple of Universalis. I'm married IRL, so I know the process. *readies ball and chain for Nathan*  |
|
|
|
Post by William on Feb 3, 2009 17:59:54 GMT -6
Sounds good to me, you Nathan?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Feb 3, 2009 18:45:09 GMT -6
sounds fine to me  thank you ryan! I'll PM you the service and all you'll have to do is post it at your convenience. |
|
|
|
Post by Amir Shervanis on Feb 3, 2009 18:59:26 GMT -6
That works for me. |
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Feb 3, 2009 19:04:33 GMT -6
would an ordination as Bosarch of Lindstrom City interfere with your obligations to the Temple of Universalis?
|
|
|
|
Post by Amir Shervanis on Feb 4, 2009 17:03:53 GMT -6
Well I'm very much an atheist IRL - I'm a biologist after all  - so I try to stay away from religion altogether. I personally think the whole concept is a bad idea. But I don't preach that to people. It's very much a personal matter at the discretion of each and every individual. On the other hand, I'm all for gay marriage, and think the government should support it equally to hetero marriage. A longtime friend of me and my wife is lesbian, and she doubled as best man/maid of honor at our wedding (we were married by a JotP). Whether that is religious or not is a matter of personal preference, but we made an effort to have as little religion involved with it as possible. So in other words; micronationally (e.g. fictionally) it doesn't make a big difference, but on a personal level I don't like being associated with religion - hence nondenominational temple. But it's up to you. It's your wedding, and I want the both of you to be happy, both personally and micronationally. So I'll serve in whatever capacity I can, and with whatever ceremony and pomp you want. And I apologize for the last minute notice, but I screwed up and have a lab tomorrow afternoon (thought it was today). Will it affect things badly if we postpone until later in the afternoon? Like around 4? |
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Feb 4, 2009 23:32:44 GMT -6
I am more of an agnostic/deist IRL so I agree with the bad idea of organized religion... which is why Bovism is such a ridiculous religion. I was just suggesting it if you wanted the title 4 works out just fine |
|
[M:0]
thank you ryan! I'll PM you the service and all you'll have to do is post it at your convenience.
- so I try to stay away from religion altogether. I personally think the whole concept is a bad idea. But I don't preach that to people. It's very much a personal matter at the discretion of each and every individual. On the other hand, I'm all for gay marriage, and think the government should support it equally to hetero marriage. A longtime friend of me and my wife is lesbian, and she doubled as best man/maid of honor at our wedding (we were married by a JotP). Whether that is religious or not is a matter of personal preference, but we made an effort to have as little religion involved with it as possible.